Screener
AMAX vs LQTI
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF
Key differences
Both AMAX and LQTI are alternative ETFs. AMAX charges 1.36% a year and LQTI 0.65%. The main difference: LQTI costs 0.71% less per year.
- LQTI costs 0.71% less per year.
- LQTI is much larger than AMAX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | LQTI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $288M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 10.96% | 9.06% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.9% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.31% | 5.16% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -3.41% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.