Screener
AMAX vs GAL
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 1.01% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, GAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $307M |
| Since | 2009 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.98% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -28.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and GAL
Explore further