Screener
GAL vs RLY
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.15% less per year.
- RLY is significantly larger than GAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GAL is classified as alternative, while RLY is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; RLY uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | RLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $307M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 2.84% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | 10.12% |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -34.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAL and RLY
Explore further