Screener
AMAX vs HYHG
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs ProShares High Yield—Interest Rate Hedged
Key differences
- HYHG costs 0.86% less per year.
- AMAX is classified as alternative, while HYHG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; HYHG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HYHG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | HYHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $168M |
| Since | 2009 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 6.83% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +8.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +10.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.98% | 5.57% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -25.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and HYHG
Explore further