Screener
AMAX vs IGHG
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs ProShares Investment Grade—Interest Rate Hedged
Key differences
- IGHG costs 1.06% less per year.
- IGHG is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; IGHG uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | IGHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $276M |
| Since | 2009 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 5.14% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.98% | 3.50% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -25.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and IGHG
Explore further