Screener
AMAX vs XRLX
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
- XRLX costs 0.16% less per year.
- AMAX is classified as alternative, while XRLX is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; XRLX uses active selection.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $51M |
| Since | 2009 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 2.68% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.98% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -15.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and XRLX
Explore further