Screener
XRLX vs XNAV
FundX Conservative ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- XRLX costs 0.07% less per year.
- XRLX is classified as mixed asset, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| XRLX | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.20% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $31M |
| Since | 2002 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 2.68% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.7% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.09% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -15.34% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XRLX and XNAV
Explore further