Screener
AMDD vs FAS
Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares vs Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- FAS costs 0.15% less per year.
- FAS is significantly larger than AMDD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMDD follows a inverse strategy; FAS uses leveraged.
- FAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMDD | FAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 11.07% | 10.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -83.3% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +37.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 64.50% | 42.90% |
| Max drawdown | -89.29% | -85.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMDD and FAS
Explore further