Screener
FAS vs FAZ
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- FAS costs 0.15% less per year.
- FAS is significantly larger than FAZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAS follows a leveraged strategy; FAZ uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, FAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAS | FAZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 1.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $120M |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 10.14% | 3.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.5% | -9.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.8% | -38.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | -27.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | -0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 42.90% | 43.24% |
| Max drawdown | -85.99% | -99.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAS and FAZ
Explore further