Screener
AMUB vs ATMP
UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Series B vs Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN
Key differences
- AMUB costs 0.15% less per year.
- ATMP is significantly larger than AMUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ATMP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMUB | ATMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $657M |
| Since | 2015 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.14% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.9% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.5% | +24.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.53% | 14.07% |
| Max drawdown | -73.46% | -70.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMUB and ATMP
Explore further