Screener
ATMP vs MLPR
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN vs ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
Key differences
- MLPR costs 0.95% less per year.
- ATMP is significantly larger than MLPR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ATMP follows a index tracking strategy; MLPR uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, MLPR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ATMP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ATMP | MLPR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $657M | $11M |
| Since | 2013 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.41% | 8.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.9% | +35.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.9% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +24.3% | +30.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.43 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.07% | 20.56% |
| Max drawdown | -70.30% | -48.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ATMP and MLPR
Explore further