Screener
AMUU vs TZA
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- TZA costs 0.07% less per year.
- TZA is significantly larger than AMUU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMUU follows a leveraged strategy; TZA uses inverse.
- TZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMUU | TZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.06% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $270M |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 6.14% | 4.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +953.3% | -67.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -46.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -30.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 128.91% | 57.16% |
| Max drawdown | -56.31% | -99.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMUU and TZA
Explore further