Screener
TZA vs TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- TZA costs 0.06% less per year.
- TNA is significantly larger than TZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TZA follows a inverse strategy; TNA uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, TNA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TZA | TNA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 1.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $270M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.33% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -67.4% | +130.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -46.0% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -30.9% | -5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.70 | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 57.16% | 57.15% |
| Max drawdown | -99.70% | -88.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TZA and TNA
Explore further