Screener
AMZA vs ENFR
InfraCap MLP ETF vs Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- ENFR costs 1.37% less per year.
- AMZA follows a active selection strategy; ENFR uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ENFR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMZA | ENFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.72% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $464M | $460M |
| Since | 2014 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 7.73% | 3.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.9% | +27.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.2% | +21.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 1.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.74% | 14.54% |
| Max drawdown | -86.84% | -62.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMZA and ENFR
Explore further