Screener
ENFR vs PIPE
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF vs Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- ENFR costs 0.40% less per year.
- ENFR is significantly larger than PIPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ENFR follows a index tracking strategy; PIPE uses active selection.
- ENFR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENFR | PIPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $460M | $64M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.93% | 3.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.43 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.54% | 14.18% |
| Max drawdown | -62.64% | -15.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENFR and PIPE
Explore further