Screener
AMZA vs MLPD
InfraCap MLP ETF vs Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- MLPD costs 1.12% less per year.
- AMZA is significantly larger than MLPD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMZA follows a active selection strategy; MLPD uses option income.
- AMZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMZA | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.72% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $464M | $29M |
| Since | 2014 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 7.73% | 10.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.9% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.74% | 7.34% |
| Max drawdown | -86.84% | -12.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMZA and MLPD
Explore further