Screener
AMZA vs MLPX
InfraCap MLP ETF vs Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- MLPX costs 1.27% less per year.
- MLPX is significantly larger than AMZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMZA follows a active selection strategy; MLPX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MLPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMZA | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.72% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $464M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2014 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 7.73% | 3.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.9% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +30.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.2% | +22.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.74% | 15.20% |
| Max drawdown | -86.84% | -64.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMZA and MLPX
Explore further