Screener
AMZA vs MLPR
InfraCap MLP ETF vs ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
Key differences
- MLPR costs 1.72% less per year.
- AMZA is significantly larger than MLPR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMZA follows a active selection strategy; MLPR uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, MLPR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMZA | MLPR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.72% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $464M | $11M |
| Since | 2014 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 7.73% | 8.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.9% | +35.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.2% | +30.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.74% | 20.56% |
| Max drawdown | -86.84% | -48.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMZA and MLPR
Explore further