Screener
ANEW vs EFA
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and EFA are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and EFA 0.32%. The main difference: EFA costs 0.13% less per year.
- EFA costs 0.13% less per year.
- EFA is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $77.4B |
| Since | 2020 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 3.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.8% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 15.27% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -34.19% |
Similar to ANEW and EFA
Explore further