Screener
ANEW vs FFLS
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Key differences
ANEW is an equity ETF, while FFLS is an alternative ETF. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and FFLS 1.60%.
- ANEW is an equity fund, while FFLS is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ANEW follows a index tracking strategy; FFLS uses long short.
- ANEW costs 1.15% less per year.
- FFLS is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 1.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $43M |
| Since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 0.12% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.8% | -2.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 9.22% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -11.05% |
Similar to ANEW and FFLS
Explore further