Skip to content
Screener

ANEW vs THRO

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF

ANEW

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$8M

THRO

iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF

Annual cost

0.57%

Fund size

$7.1B

Key differences

Both ANEW and THRO are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and THRO 0.57%. The main difference: ANEW follows a index tracking strategy; THRO uses active selection.

  • ANEW follows a index tracking strategy; THRO uses active selection.
  • ANEW covers global markets; THRO covers North America.
  • ANEW costs 0.12% less per year.
  • THRO is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, THRO has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

ANEWTHRO
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.57%
Fund size (AUM)$8M$7.1B
Since20202021
Dividend yield0.61%0.16%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+2.6%+24.1%
CAGR 3Y+13.1%+23.6%
CAGR 5Y+3.3%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.641.19
Volatility 1Y13.62%13.67%
Max drawdown-39.87%-26.55%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ANEW and THRO