Screener
ANEW vs INRO
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and INRO are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and INRO 0.42%. The main difference: ANEW follows a index tracking strategy; INRO uses active selection.
- ANEW follows a index tracking strategy; INRO uses active selection.
- ANEW covers global markets; INRO covers North America.
- INRO is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | INRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $33M |
| Since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 0.65% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.6% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.62% | 13.45% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -20.02% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.