Screener
ANGL vs BBH
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs VanEck Biotech ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.10% less per year.
- ANGL is significantly larger than BBH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ANGL is classified as fixed income, while BBH is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, ANGL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $365M |
| Since | 2012 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.1% | +26.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.34% | 18.82% |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and BBH
Explore further