Screener
ANGL vs GPZ
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.15% less per year.
- ANGL is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ANGL is classified as fixed income, while GPZ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ANGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $245M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.34% | — |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -31.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and GPZ
Explore further