Screener
ANGL vs CLOB
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs Vaneck Aa-bb Clo Etf
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.20% less per year.
- ANGL is significantly larger than CLOB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ANGL follows a index tracking strategy; CLOB uses active selection.
- ANGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | CLOB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $167M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 6.55% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.1% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.34% | 3.03% |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -5.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and CLOB
Explore further