Screener
ANGL vs CLOI
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs VanEck CLO ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.11% less per year.
- ANGL follows a index tracking strategy; CLOI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ANGL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ANGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | CLOI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2012 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 5.44% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.1% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 1.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.34% | 1.21% |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -3.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and CLOI
Explore further