Screener
ANGL vs EMBX
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.51% less per year.
- ANGL is significantly larger than EMBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ANGL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | EMBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $244M |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 5.51% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.0% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.33% | 5.94% |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -37.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and EMBX
Explore further