Screener
ANGL vs BREM
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.25% less per year.
- ANGL is significantly larger than BREM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ANGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | BREM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $38M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.33% | — |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -4.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and BREM
Explore further