Screener
ANGL vs GTO
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.10% less per year.
- ANGL follows a index tracking strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ANGL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $2.3B |
| Since | 2012 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.1% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.34% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -20.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and GTO
Explore further