Screener
ANGL vs GTOQ
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.14% less per year.
- ANGL is significantly larger than GTOQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ANGL is classified as fixed income, while GTOQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ANGL follows a index tracking strategy; GTOQ uses multi strategy.
- ANGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | GTOQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $162M |
| Since | 2012 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 6.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.1% | +8.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.34% | 3.69% |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -15.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and GTOQ
Explore further