Screener
ANGL vs PGF
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.30% less per year.
- ANGL is significantly larger than PGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ANGL is classified as fixed income, while PGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, ANGL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $719M |
| Since | 2012 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.0% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | -0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.33% | 6.36% |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -28.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and PGF
Explore further