Skip to content
Screener

AOA vs EFA

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

AOA

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.2B

EFA

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

Annual cost

0.32%

Fund size

$77.4B

Key differences

AOA is a mixed asset ETF, while EFA is an equity ETF. AOA charges 0.15% a year and EFA 0.32%.

  • AOA is a mixed asset fund, while EFA is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • AOA covers North America; EFA covers global markets excluding the US.
  • AOA costs 0.17% less per year.
  • EFA is much larger than AOA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

AOAEFA
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.32%
Fund size (AUM)$3.2B$77.4B
Since20082001
Dividend yield2.05%3.10%
Asset classmixed assetequity
Regionnorth americaglobal ex us
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+21.9%+21.3%
CAGR 3Y+17.2%+17.0%
CAGR 5Y+8.9%+8.4%
Sharpe 3Y1.110.87
Volatility 1Y11.15%15.64%
Max drawdown-28.38%-34.19%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to AOA and EFA