Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

AOA vs IWR

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

AOA

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.0B

IWR

iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$52.6B

Key differences

  • IWR is significantly larger than AOA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOA is classified as mixed asset, while IWR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

AOAIWR
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.18%
Fund size (AUM)$3.0B$52.6B
Since20082001
Dividend yield2.12%1.19%
Asset classmixed assetequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+24.6%+21.8%
CAGR 3Y+17.5%+17.2%
CAGR 5Y+9.3%+8.1%
Sharpe 3Y1.140.86
Volatility 1Y10.68%13.50%
Max drawdown-28.38%-40.59%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to AOA and IWR