Skip to content
Screener

AOA vs MEMA

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF vs Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF

AOA

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.2B

MEMA

Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$13M

Key differences

AOA is a mixed asset ETF, while MEMA is an alternative ETF. AOA charges 0.15% a year and MEMA 0.85%.

  • AOA is a mixed asset fund, while MEMA is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • AOA follows a index tracking strategy; MEMA uses long short.
  • AOA covers North America; MEMA covers emerging markets.
  • AOA costs 0.70% less per year.
  • AOA is much larger than MEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

AOAMEMA
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.85%
Fund size (AUM)$3.2B$13M
Since20082025
Dividend yield2.05%
Asset classmixed assetalternative
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyindex trackinglong short
CAGR 1Y+21.9%N/A
CAGR 3Y+17.2%N/A
CAGR 5Y+8.9%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.11N/A
Volatility 1Y11.15%
Max drawdown-28.38%-13.12%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to AOA and MEMA