Screener
MEMA vs MATE
Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
- MEMA costs 0.12% less per year.
- MATE is significantly larger than MEMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MEMA follows a long short strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEMA | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $37M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | long short | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -13.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEMA and MATE
Explore further