Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

AOM vs EAOM

iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF vs iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

AOM

iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$1.7B

EAOM

iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$8M

Key differences

  • AOM is significantly larger than EAOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOM follows a index tracking strategy; EAOM uses active selection.
  • AOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

AOMEAOM
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.18%
Fund size (AUM)$1.7B$8M
Since20082020
Dividend yield3.04%2.84%
Asset classmixed assetmixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+15.2%+14.9%
CAGR 3Y+10.8%+10.3%
CAGR 5Y+4.9%+4.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.960.89
Volatility 1Y6.55%6.47%
Max drawdown-19.96%-20.73%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to AOM and EAOM