Screener
AOR vs IWL
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- AOR is classified as mixed asset, while IWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- AOR follows a active selection strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AOR | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.5B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2008 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.53% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.8% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.4% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.47% | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -22.95% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AOR and IWL
Explore further