Screener
IWL vs AOM
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF vs iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Key differences
- IWL is classified as equity, while AOM is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWL | AOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $1.7B |
| Since | 2009 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.4% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.7% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.34% | 6.55% |
| Max drawdown | -32.71% | -19.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWL and AOM
Explore further