Screener
APUE vs MEMA
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF vs Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF
Key differences
- APUE costs 0.54% less per year.
- APUE is significantly larger than MEMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- APUE is classified as equity, while MEMA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- APUE covers north america markets; MEMA covers emerging markets.
- APUE follows a active selection strategy; MEMA uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| APUE | MEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.31% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.4B | $12M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.79% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.36% | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.83% | -13.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to APUE and MEMA
Explore further