Screener
AQWA vs EMBD
Global X Clean Water ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.11% less per year.
- EMBD is significantly larger than AQWA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AQWA is classified as equity, while EMBD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- AQWA follows a index tracking strategy; EMBD uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| AQWA | EMBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $256M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 5.67% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +9.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | +3.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.47 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.42% | 6.04% |
| Max drawdown | -29.44% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AQWA and EMBD
Explore further