Screener
AQWA vs EMCS
Global X Clean Water ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
Key differences
- EMCS costs 0.35% less per year.
- EMCS is significantly larger than AQWA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EMCS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AQWA | EMCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $912M |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 1.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +50.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.6% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.0% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.38% | 21.77% |
| Max drawdown | -29.44% | -44.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AQWA and EMCS
Explore further