Screener
AQWA vs SMOG
Global X Clean Water ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Key differences
- AQWA costs 0.14% less per year.
- SMOG is significantly larger than AQWA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AQWA | SMOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $152M |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.47 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.42% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -29.44% | -51.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AQWA and SMOG
Explore further