Screener
ARKQ vs IBOT
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF vs Vaneck Robotics ETF
Key differences
- IBOT costs 0.28% less per year.
- ARKQ is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ARKQ follows a active selection strategy; IBOT uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ARKQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ARKQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ARKQ | IBOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $71M |
| Since | 2014 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.24% | 0.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +76.7% | +56.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +41.9% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 32.38% | 21.95% |
| Max drawdown | -59.89% | -25.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ARKQ and IBOT
Explore further