Screener
IBOT vs ROBO
Vaneck Robotics ETF vs Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF
Key differences
- IBOT costs 0.48% less per year.
- ROBO is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBOT follows a index tracking strategy; ROBO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IBOT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROBO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBOT | ROBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.3% | +57.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.0% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.95% | 22.95% |
| Max drawdown | -25.39% | -43.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBOT and ROBO
Explore further