Screener
ARTY vs LRNZ
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF vs TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF
Key differences
- ARTY costs 0.22% less per year.
- ARTY is significantly larger than LRNZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ARTY covers global markets; LRNZ covers north america.
- ARTY follows a index tracking strategy; LRNZ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ARTY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ARTY | LRNZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $31M |
| Since | 2018 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +90.4% | +35.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.8% | +24.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.2% | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.13% | 27.41% |
| Max drawdown | -54.50% | -61.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ARTY and LRNZ
Explore further