Screener
LRNZ vs AIQ
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
Key differences
- AIQ is significantly larger than LRNZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LRNZ follows a active selection strategy; AIQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, AIQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | AIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $8.6B |
| Since | 2020 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | +56.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | +18.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.41% | 22.54% |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -44.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRNZ and AIQ
Explore further