Screener
ARVR vs FSCS
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF vs First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF
Key differences
- FSCS costs 0.10% less per year.
- FSCS is significantly larger than ARVR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ARVR covers asia pacific markets; FSCS covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, ARVR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FSCS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ARVR | FSCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $58M |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.4% | +2.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | +11.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.39% | 13.00% |
| Max drawdown | -26.25% | -43.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ARVR and FSCS
Explore further