Screener
ARVR vs FSGS
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF vs First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
- FSGS costs 0.09% less per year.
- FSGS is significantly larger than ARVR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ARVR covers asia pacific markets; FSGS covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, ARVR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FSGS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ARVR | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $29M |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.4% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.39% | 15.31% |
| Max drawdown | -26.25% | -43.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ARVR and FSGS
Explore further