Screener
ASCI vs ABFL
abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF vs Abacus FCF Leaders ETF
Key differences
- ABFL costs 0.21% less per year.
- ABFL is significantly larger than ASCI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASCI covers global markets; ABFL covers north america.
- ASCI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASCI | ABFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $498M |
| Since | 2009 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.34% |
| Max drawdown | -11.22% | -34.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASCI and ABFL
Explore further