Screener
ASEA vs GMF
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both ASEA and GMF are equity ETFs. ASEA charges 0.65% a year and GMF 0.49%. The main difference: ASEA covers the Asia-Pacific region; GMF covers emerging markets.
- ASEA covers the Asia-Pacific region; GMF covers emerging markets.
- GMF costs 0.16% less per year.
- GMF is much larger than ASEA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GMF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASEA | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $97M | $406M |
| Since | 2011 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.1% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.17% | 17.01% |
| Max drawdown | -44.16% | -40.18% |
Similar to ASEA and GMF
Explore further